The 2022 overturning of the landmark Roe v. Wade decision trigged abortion bans across the country. This is a bad thing, whether abortion is moral or not. This four-point plan tries to reverse the problem. (The opinions expressed in this article are those of the individual author, Isabella Romeu.)
Big Picture
Over a year ago, the landmark case Roe v. Wade was overturned. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the right to obtain an abortion was not protected by the Constitution, and therefore a matter that must be left up to the states. The ethics of abortion are complex, and intelligent, philosophical arguments have been offered from pro-life and pro-choice perspectives. But banning abortion, as a number of states have done since the Dobbs decision, is not the way to go. Without bodily autonomy, women will resort to either self-induced abortions or traveling to a state where abortion remains legal.
Operative Definitions
Important Facts and Statistics
Four-Point Plan
(1) Pass the Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA) of 2021. This bill would prohibit states from restricting access to abortion. By banning states from impeding abortion services, women would not have to resort to expensive travel or self-induced abortions.
(2) Make abortion more affordable. Past research has demonstrated that the main group who seek abortion care are low-income women and women who already have a family. Carrying the pregnancy to term would cause financial distress and opting for an abortion would be the safest financial move. However, the average cost of an abortion is $600 excluding travel costs and aftercare. This price point is out of many women’s budgets; therefore, costs must be lowered to expand the procedure’s accessibility.
(3) Protect abortion providers. In states that are passing trigger bans, abortion providers may be sentenced to prison time if they perform an abortion or assist a woman in obtaining one. Protecting these providers would not only allow them to continue their medical practice but also reduce the massive influx of women traveling to “safe states” to undergo the procedure.
(4) Expand the types of qualified providers. By allocating funds to training more healthcare workers, the number of abortion providers would increase exponentially. With more qualified providers, access would become easier as women would not have their procedures extremely delayed.
Why This Initiative is Important
Whether abortion is right or wrong, abortion bans aren't the answer. Research has demonstrated that restricting access to abortion does not reduce the number of abortions, but instead increases the number of abortion-related fatalities. Abortion is healthcare, and without proper access to it, women will die, especially those from low-income communities and communities of color. Many do not have the means to travel to another state to terminate their pregnancy and will resort to perforating their uteruses, ingesting poisonous liquids, or having an unlicensed individual perform the procedure. For women who do have the funds and time to travel to a “safe” state, their abortion may be delayed due to the massive influx of patients that abortion clinics will be receiving now that Roe v. Wade has fallen.
Acknowledgments
The following student worked on this nonpartisan proposal: Isabella Romeu, University of Chicago.
Sources
“Abortion Laws by State.” Center for Reproductive Rights, 25 July 2022, https://reproductiverights.org/maps/abortion-laws-by-state/.
Congress. “H.R.3755 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Women's Health Protection Act of ...” United States Congress, 2022, https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3755.
Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC). “Fourth Amendment.” EPIC, n.d., https://epic.org/issues/privacy-laws/fourth-amendment/.
Galston, William A. “Roe v. Wade Overturned despite Public Opinion.” Brookings Institute, 24 June 2022, https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2022/06/24/roe-v-wade-overturned-despite-public-opinion/.
Gold, Rachel Benson, and Guttmacher Institute. “Lessons from before Roe: Will Past Be Prologue?” Guttmacher Institute, 14 Sept. 2018, https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2003/03/lessons-roe-will-past-be-prologue.
Lenharo, Mariana. “After Roe v. Wade: US Researchers Warn of What's to Come.” Nature News, Nature Publishing Group, 24 June 2022, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01775-z.
Planned Parenthood. “What Is a Miscarriage?: Causes of Miscarriage.” Planned Parenthood, n.d., https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/pregnancy/miscarriage.
Reuters. “Roe v. Wade Ruling Disproportionately Hurts Black Women, Experts Say.” New York Post, New York Post, 27 June 2022, https://nypost.com/2022/06/27/roe-v-wade-ruling-disproportionately-hurts-black-women-experts-say/.
"State Bans on Abortion Throughout Pregnancy." Guttmacher Institute, August 2023, https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/state-policies-later-abortions#:~:text=43%20states%20prohibit%20some%20abortions,14%20states%20ban%20abortion.
Stevenson, Amanda Jean. “Study Shows an Abortion Ban May Lead to a 21% Increase in Pregnancy-Related Deaths.” Colorado Arts and Sciences, 22 Oct. 2021, https://www.colorado.edu/asmagazine/2021/09/22/study-shows-abortion-ban-may-lead-21-increase-pregnancy-related-deaths.